Count Zero

Count Zero

  • A cyberpunk written by William Ford Gibson in 1986
  • Reviewed edition by Arbor House from 1987
  • A paperback has 250 pages
  • ISBN 0-441-11773-2
Click to rate this book from worst12345to best.

The book follows three seemingly unrelated threads - a hired gun is setting up an ambush to help a top scientist escape his employee - a teenager miraculously avoids death in cyberspace when acting as a guinea pig for a software dealer - a discredited art expert is hired by an excentric millionaire to trace origins of a sculpture. As the plot unfolds, the three protagonists discover they are unfortunate pawns in what turns out to be a strife for immortality ... (almost, but not quite, a spoiler :-)


Review

The feeling of the book is bizarre. The characters themselves are mostly weird - indifferent parents hooked on TV soaps, crazed kids fighting street battles, dealers selling black market stuff, all portrayed as normal. The scenery corresponds to this as well - night clubs, half abandoned buildings, desert sites (of course, William Gibson said his vision of a future city is that of the Blade Runner movie, and it is exactly what you get).

Accepting the bizarreness, one thing still occurs to me as awkward - some characters look like archetypes taken straight out of a second rate movie. This is most apparent with Turner, the hired gun - naturally, he looks like a guy who is not to be messed with, listening to his special battle instinct, moral in his own way, with a soft spot hidden deep in his heart - sounds familiar perhaps ?

Some of the technological visions seem strange as well - not that they would be too sophisticated (one learns to accept far-fetched inventions in science fiction), but they are mildly inconsistent. As a result, hackers seem to be lagging behind the technological progress, still needing fingers and electrodes to navigate through cyberspace consisting of filled rectangles, while other people just need to touch a door knob to get into an almost-perfect virtual world.

Anyway, enough complaining. The book is a nice thriller, the psychological side perhaps spoiled a bit by a sweet happy end (the bad guys got nailed and the good guys all lived happily ever after), which sort of does not fit in with the otherwise bleak scenery. I would mark it as an average read.

Rated as average by Ceres on 1998-09-14


Back To Index